Charging Different Prices to Different Customers in New Hampshire In New Hampshire, businesses are generally allowed to charge different prices to different customers, as long as the pricing is not discriminatory. Discrimination in pricing is prohibited under the New Hampshire Law Against Discrimination (RSA 354-A). According to RSA 354-A:7, it is unlawful for any person to discriminate in the price of any commodity or service offered for sale or in the rental or lease of any property because of the person’s age, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, color, marital status, familial status, physical or mental disability, religion, or national origin.

Using Customer Data for Marketing Purposes in Idaho In Idaho, using customer data for marketing purposes without violating privacy laws requires obtaining explicit consent from the customers and ensuring the security of the data [3.1]. According to Idaho law, a city, county, state agency, individual, or commercial entity that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information about a resident of Idaho must give notice to the affected Idaho resident if there is a breach of the security of the system [3.

Here is your updated answer: According to MTCO 30-14-901, businesses can charge different prices to different customers as long as the price differentials make due allowance for the costs of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which the commodities are sold or delivered to the purchasers. However, if the effect of the discrimination upon other businesses or customers is to substantially lessen competition, to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any business that grants or knowingly receives the benefit of the discrimination, it would be considered unlawful discrimination in price.

Requirements for the use of customer data for marketing purposes in Georgia According to GACO 10-1-632, a franchisor, manufacturer, distributor, or a third party acting on behalf of a franchisor, manufacturer, or distributor shall comply with and shall not cause a dealer to violate any applicable restrictions on reuse or disclosure of the consumer data established by federal or state law. They may use customer data for reasonable marketing purposes that benefit the dealer, but they must obtain the express consent of the dealer to access or obtain consumer data directly from a dealer’s data management system.

Using Customer Data for Marketing Purposes in Florida In Florida, using customer data for marketing purposes is regulated by the Florida Telemarketing Act [1.1]. The Act requires commercial telephone sellers and entities providing substance abuse marketing services to obtain a license from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services [1.1]. To obtain a license, an applicant must submit a written application to the department, which must include information about the applicant’s previous experience as a commercial telephone seller or salesperson, any previous convictions or pending litigation involving fraud, theft, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, or misappropriation of property, and the complete street address of each location from which the applicant will be doing business [1.

Here is what I found in the context documents: Requirements for Charging Different Prices to Different Customers in Minnesota In Minnesota, it is generally legal to charge different prices to different customers, as long as the price differences are not based on discriminatory factors such as race, gender, religion, or national origin. However, there are some specific requirements that businesses must follow to avoid violating discrimination laws. Under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, it is illegal to discriminate against customers based on their protected characteristics, including race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, and age.

Charging Different Prices to Different Customers in Michigan Michigan law does not have a specific statute that prohibits price discrimination. However, businesses must comply with federal laws that prohibit price discrimination, such as the Robinson-Patman Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act [1.1]. Under the Robinson-Patman Act, it is illegal for a seller to charge different prices to different customers if the effect of such discrimination may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce [1.

To use customer data for marketing purposes in Connecticut, you must comply with the requirements set forth in the Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) sections 42-515 to 42-525, inclusive, which are effective July 1, 2023. Requirements for using customer data for marketing purposes According to CGS section 42-520, a controller shall not process the personal data of a consumer for purposes of targeted advertising, or sell the consumer’s personal data without the consumer’s consent, under circumstances where a controller has actual knowledge, and wilfully disregards, that the consumer is at least thirteen years of age but younger than sixteen years of age.

Using Customer Data for Marketing Purposes in California Under the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), businesses are required to provide consumers with notice of the categories of personal information they collect and the purposes for which the information will be used [1.2]([1.2]). Therefore, businesses must inform consumers if their personal information will be used for marketing purposes. Notice Requirements Businesses must provide consumers with a privacy policy that includes a description of their rights under the CCPA, including the right to opt-out of the sale of their personal information [1.

According to the Maine law, price discrimination is prohibited [1.1]. Therefore, charging different prices to different customers may be considered discriminatory and illegal. However, there may be exceptions to this rule. One exception to the prohibition of price discrimination is the minimum charge requirement for utilities [2.1]. Any transmission and distribution utility serving more than 5,000 customers that has a residential rate combining energy and demand costs in a single rate that neither declines nor increases, but is flat as consumption increases shall recover its customer costs through the same rate.